By Kimutai Kirui, Eldoret-based Human Rights Activist
In recent weeks, political rallies across Kenya have become increasingly heated, with inflammatory rhetoric and tribal undertones threatening to reignite deep-rooted divisions within the country. Critics argue that the vitriol being directed at specific political figures, particularly from the Mt. Kenya region, is not only fueling hostility but could push the nation toward an era of instability reminiscent of the 2007 Post-Election Violence (PEV).
At the heart of this issue is a growing trend of personal attacks, particularly targeting individuals like Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua and President William Ruto. While political figures are expected to engage in healthy debate, many argue that the harsh language and tribal labels being used are exacerbating tensions rather than fostering unity. The rhetoric being espoused by some leaders is worrying, with inflammatory language now commonplace in rallies attended by top government officials.
One recent example saw prominent political leaders such as Kimani Ichungwa and Oscar Sudi make divisive remarks that have raised alarms. In one rally, Ichungwa referred to Deputy President Gachagua as a “snake,” a comment that many saw as an unnecessary and dangerous personal attack. Similarly, Sudi’s derogatory remarks about former President Uhuru Kenyatta and his mother only deepened the sense of frustration among the public.
Even more concerning is the language being used to refer to the Kikuyu community. Critics argue that singling out ethnic groups during public rallies is not only divisive but could potentially escalate into dangerous tribal sentiments that threaten the unity of the nation. The portrayal of political leaders like Ruto and Gachagua as tribal figures risks deepening rifts between communities, making it harder to heal the wounds of Kenya’s past.
“The rhetoric we’re hearing today mirrors the very language that led to the 2007 PEV,” said political analyst Maria Wambui. “The rise in tribal hate speech and the use of inflammatory language in public spaces is a cause for serious concern. If we are not careful, we could be heading down a dangerous path.”
The UDA party, which currently holds power, has faced increasing criticism for its militant approach at political events. Many have pointed to the aggressive behavior of party supporters, particularly when in the presence of the president, as further evidence of the growing intolerance in Kenyan politics. The increased presence of these supporters at key events raises questions about the role of political parties in shaping the country’s political discourse.
At the same time, the harsh exchanges between political leaders have led to further fragmentation. Recently, Kimani Ichungwa was seen engaging in a bitter altercation with Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya in front of the president and the public. In another instance, Ichungwa caused a stir in Kesses when he suggested that some political leaders from Uasin Gishu were not supportive of the president, only for Sudi to later offer a correction.
Experts warn that the current political climate, if left unchecked, could lead to further divisions and even violence. With a nation still scarred from past election-related violence, there is a growing call for leaders to prioritize national unity over personal and ethnic politics.
“We must remember that the political rhetoric we hear today has consequences,” said human rights activist Peter Kamket. “When we speak of leaders as ‘snakes’ or ‘tribal chiefs,’ we are not just attacking individuals—we are attacking the very fabric of our nation. If we want Kenya to move forward, we need to foster a culture of respect, dialogue, and understanding.”
As the political landscape continues to heat up, Kenyans from all walks of life are urging their leaders to choose their words wisely and put the nation’s unity above party interests. Only through collaborative leadership and a commitment to peace can Kenya avoid the kind of turmoil that has historically plagued the country during times of political uncertainty.
The message is clear: the time for a more respectful, inclusive, and forward-thinking political discourse in Kenya is now. It is a matter of national urgency.